I
thought it was interesting how it was brought up that Dante focused on Islam
more in regard with its origins, and didn’t really focus much on the
traditional interpretations of its history. Dante kind of tied it all back to
have Christianity be the focus, and showed how, in his opinion, Muhammad was
pushing for the divisions in Christianity. Instead of writing about the
qualities he thought that Muhammad might have had as a follower of Islam, or about
the Islam traditions that he would have followed, Dante went back to his role
as a prophet and leader of the people. Thinking about it this way, I do like
how Dante focused on the origins of Islam and Muhammad as a prophet. Knowing
how something—especially something as important and sacred to people as a
religion—came about and the beginnings of its traditions is important. It’s
also interesting how his knowledge of Islam was learned in relation to
Christianity and tended to be in anti-Islam works, but it’s cool that he kind
of looked past that a little and had his own view about it, as the article
says. Dante being an intellectual person, and writing this great work of
literature, it’s good and important that he had an interest in things other
than what was the norm in his part of the world and was educated about other, different
things.
No comments:
Post a Comment